After more than 355 years in business, Hudson’s Bay (The Bay) shuttered its remaining stores in 2025, ending a retail legacy that once anchored malls across Canada.

The collapse of The Bay wasn’t just the failure of a single department store—it exposed a deeper structural shift underway in the Canadian retail sector.

For decades, shopping malls were built around large department stores that generated foot traffic and supported dozens of smaller retailers. As e-commerce accelerated and economic pressures reshaped consumer spending, that traditional model began to break down.

Today, the prime retail spaces left behind by the likes of The Bay, as well as Nordstrom and Saks Fifth Avenue, represent one of the most complex retail real estate challenges facing Canadian cities. Across the country, developers, mall owners, and municipalities are asking the same question: what comes next?

The answer may redefine the role of malls in Canada over the next decade. 

The current state of Canada’s shopping malls

Canada’s retail sector has proven more resilient than many expected.

Retail availability across major cities remains low, suggesting continued demand for well-located retail space. However, not all formats are performing equally.

Enclosed malls—particularly those heavily dependent on fashion retailers—have been slower to recover from pandemic disruptions and shifting consumer behaviours. Meanwhile, neighbourhood shopping centres and open-air retail strips have rebounded as consumers prioritize convenience and proximity. 

 

A brief history of the Canadian mall

To understand where malls are going, it helps to revisit how they evolved.

Canada’s mall boom began in the mid-1900s, when suburban expansion and rising car ownership fueled the development of shopping centres. These malls were designed around department store anchors like The Bay, Eaton’s, and later Sears.

A typical mall included:

  • Two or three large department stores
  • Dozens of smaller retailers
  • A central food court
  • Expansive parking

For decades, this model thrived. Malls became both retail hubs and social gathering spaces.

However, the decline of department stores has been unfolding for years. Eaton’s collapsed in 1999, Sears Canada followed in 2017, and the closure of The Bay in 2025 marked the end of the traditional Canadian department store era. 

The Bay effect

The closure of The Bay left behind one of the largest concentrations of vacant retail space in Canadian history.

More than 70 former The Bay and Saks locations suddenly became empty, representing millions of square feet of retail space across the country.

The scale of these stores presents a major challenge. While the average Canadian mall tenant occupies roughly 3,700 square feet, former department stores often exceed 150,000 square feet. Few modern retailers need that much space.

As a result, landlords and developers must rethink not just tenants, but the purpose of these properties altogether.

Image

The scale problem: Spaces too big for modern retail

Department stores once served as the gravitational centre of malls, drawing customers who then shopped at smaller stores. Today’s retail ecosystem is far more fragmented.

Malls are now anchored by:

  • Smaller specialty brands
  • Digitally integrated retailers
  • Experiential destinations
  • Food and entertainment concepts 

Large single-tenant retail spaces are increasingly difficult to lease, pushing landlords toward subdivision and reconfiguration strategies.

Many former department stores are now being subdivided into multiple smaller units, allowing malls to attract a wider mix of tenants. 

From shopping centres to retail destinations

Increasingly, the answer isn’t more retail spaces—but more reasons to be there.

The emerging model for Canadian malls is the “retail destination”: a mixed-use environment where shopping is only one component of a larger ecosystem that includes residential, office, entertainment, and community uses.

This shift reflects a core change in how consumers interact with physical space. People are no longer willing to travel solely to shop. They will travel—and spend time—where shopping is integrated into daily life, work, services, and social activity.

By integrating offices, housing, healthcare, education, and public amenities directly into mall sites, developers create a built-in customer base that generates foot traffic throughout the week, not just during peak retail hours.

Across Canada, mall owners are already experimenting with new uses for former anchor spaces. Early reinvention strategies include:

  • Discount retailers
  • Entertainment venues
  • Community and service tenants
  • New retail formats, like grocers and outlets

In many cases, former department store footprints are being redeveloped vertically—adding residential towers or office space above a reconfigured retail base—allowing landlords to maximize land value while reducing reliance on large-format retail tenants. 

Jonathan Krieger - Profile Image 240x277_20260331_020712.jpg
Earlier this year, I visited a large urban shopping centre that captured the evolution of what malls are becoming. Retailers occupied smaller, more intentional footprints, surrounded by a wide mix of dining and entertainment. Built into an area of high residential and office density, the mall functioned less as a traditional retail space and more as a living part of the city. It’s easy to imagine this model translating to some of Canada’s growing urban centres, where density, transit access, and mixed-use development are reshaping how and why people interact with retail spaces.
Jonathan Krieger Partner

Examples of mall reinvention in Canada

Oakridge Park, Vancouver

The Oakridge Park redevelopment will transform the former Oakridge Centre into a mixed-use district featuring:

  • Residential towers
  • Office space
  • Retail and restaurants
  • Public parkland
  • Community amenities, including a library and daycare

Rather than functioning as a traditional mall, the site is being reimagined as a complete urban neighbourhood. Retail now acts as the connective tissue between where people live, work, and gather.

 

Square One District, Mississauga

Around Square One Shopping Centre, developers are building Square One District, a multi-decade project that will include approximately 18,000 residential units, parks, and office space.

The mall remains operational but is gradually becoming the centre of a dense urban district.

As population density increases around the mall, retail benefits from built-in demand driven by residents and office workers, reducing dependence on destination shopping alone. 

 

Yorkdale, Toronto

Other malls are pursuing a different strategy: focusing on luxury retail.

Yorkdale Shopping Centre has evolved into one of Canada’s premier luxury shopping destinations. Its success demonstrates that top-tier malls can still thrive by offering curated, high-end retail experiences. 

However, Yorkdale’s success also reflects its ability to curate scarcity, experience, and brand prestige—advantages not available to most malls. 

What this means for retailers and investors

For retailers looking to enter—or expand within—the market, the decline of the department store anchor fundamentally reshapes how mall opportunities should be evaluated.

The question isn't what mall has the strongest anchor, but:

The question isn't what mall has the strongest anchor, but:

Who lives and works around this centre?
.
What other uses are integrated into the site?
.
How many visits, and for what reasons beyond shopping?
.

    Mixed-use malls offer something department stores once did: guaranteed traffic. But instead of drawing customers a few times a month, residential and office components create daily, repeat visits. The most resilient retail concepts moving forward will be those that serve everyday needs, provide experiences that cannot be replicated online, or integrate seamlessly into consumers’ daily routines.

    Retail is no longer the destination—it’s part of the destination.

    The end of the anchor era

    For years, headlines have predicted the death of the mall. In reality, malls aren’t disappearing—they’re reinventing themselves.

    The closure of The Bay didn’t simply remove a retailer; it removed the final pillar of a retail model built around large department store anchors.

    What replaces those anchors will shape the next generation of Canadian retail. And in many cases, the mall of the future may look less like a shopping centre—and more like the centre of a community.